nods's comments
<< back to profile
Comments: 13 | Prop Total: 28 | Avg: 2.15
Photo | Video | News | Wall
  • + 0 props
(Dec 30, 2008 at 13:31) (Below Threshold) show comment
camera angle is bad. overall a pretty uninspiring photo. think of how much better this would be if the camera were angled so we could get a feeling of the slope of the terrain.
  • + 0 props
(Dec 22, 2008 at 16:40) (Below Threshold) show comment
I like the pic but the flash isn't in the perfect place despite what people keep saying. Having a big hot spot in a picture isn't a good thing, especially when you don't want people to focus on it. If you want people to focus on the rider, that should be where the point of greatest contrast is. If the flash were placed so it wasn't so obvious, this picture would be better.
  • - 1 props
(Aug 12, 2008 at 22:06) (Below Threshold) show comment
sometimes people confuse a photo of something good with a good photo. this is one of those pictures that captures something rad but is technically shit. poor perspective, poor composition, harsh light, poor colour. POD because of the drop, not the qualitySmile
  • + 0 props
(Aug 12, 2008 at 22:01) (Below Threshold) show comment
the worst is when people say 'epic fail'. what nerd came up with that one?
  • + 0 props
(Jul 4, 2008 at 7:58) (Below Threshold) show comment
great pic but too much saturation tool.
  • + 2 props
(Jun 3, 2008 at 20:39) (Below Threshold) show comment
i feel like i've gone back in time and taked my 1.5 steer tube with me
  • + 10 props
(Jun 3, 2008 at 7:04) (Below Threshold) show comment
you've been to most parts of the world?
  • + 19 props
(Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18) (Below Threshold) show comment
aaustin--camera is tilted about 30 degrees. look at the angle of the grass, the fern and the trail in the background. it doesn't matter though because tilting made the photo better. what's wrong with that?
  • + 6 props
(May 25, 2008 at 8:38) (Below Threshold) show comment
To all those who say this can be done with a slow shutter speed while zooming: You can only do this with a stationary object. The rider is not a stationary object, even if he tries to maintain this position while moving directly at the camera, any slight movement would show up as a blur. There's nothing wrong with using Photoshop because it's a great tool. That said, there's no point in denying it when it's used.
  • + 2 props
(Apr 27, 2008 at 7:38) (Below Threshold) show comment
The photo is on a 45 degree angle to make it look crazier. Trees don't grow out of the ground at 45 degrees. Okay pic but nothing special.
  • + 1 props
(Apr 15, 2008 at 7:25) (Below Threshold) show comment
^^Agreed. Something funny here but still an awesome pic.
  • + 2 props
(Apr 14, 2008 at 23:31) (Below Threshold) show comment
Just because someone says it's photoshopped doesn't mean that they're saying that the trick isn't real. Sometimes photos need a little boost to make the photo nicer. It's not a bad thing, that's what what photoshop is for. In this case, the sky was done in photoshop because otherwise it would have been completely white. Not a big deal.
  • - 13 props
(Mar 26, 2008 at 7:48) (Below Threshold) show comment
If he was going as fast as the photoshop motion blur makes it look like he's going he's asking for a broken collarbone. Love the pic, though the blur is a little over-done. Great colour and lighting.
Previous Page1Next Page